Ask AI
Opens the assistant with a question about this page. Answers come from the AI, not this site.
ChatGPTClaudePerplexity· Precursor
Revised residency ordinance, No. 7319, is on the City Commission agenda for first reading
The February 14, 2012 City Commission agenda listed Ordinance No. 7319 for first reading. It would add Section 10-3-29 to the Municipal Code restricting where registered sex offenders assigned a risk level of "High," "Moderate" or "Not Reported" by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice could establish a new or relocated residence: not within 1,000 feet of certain day care centers and other places where children commonly gather. It included a waiver. The February 21 and February 28, 2012 agendas list no second reading; on both, Ordinance No. 7319 is a rezoning near Western Street and Farmers Avenue.[1][2][3]
What the sources say
- ✓ Verified
The video index for the February 14, 2012 City Commission regular meeting lists item 2, "ORDINANCE NO. 7319," described as "the first reading of an ordinance amending Chapter 10-3, Article III of the Amarillo Municipal Code to add a new section 10-3-29 to restrict the residence location of certain registered sex offenders, providing for a waiver." As proposed it would apply to offenders assigned a risk level of "High," "Moderate," or "Not Reported" by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, within 1,000 feet of certain day care centers and other premises where children commonly gather, and to "those affected parties establishing new or relocated residences." The video index does not record the vote. [1]
- ✓ Verified
On the February 21, 2012 City Commission agenda, Ordinance No. 7319 is the first reading of a rezoning of a 66.58-acre tract near Western Street and Farmers Avenue, and on the February 28, 2012 agenda it is that rezoning's second and final reading. Neither agenda lists a second reading of the sex offender residency ordinance, and no later adoption was found. The City has not published a reason the ordinance did not advance. [2][3]
- ⚠ Sources differ
What happened to the proposal after the December 2011 public hearing.
Reported value 1[4]
- Value
- The matter did not reappear on future agendas after the December 2011 public hearing
As reported by the Amarillo Tribune in September 2026