Skip to content
Amarillo Ledger

Water

The Texas Water Development Board's 2027 State Water Plan projects that the City of Amarillo will need 46,830 acre-feet of water a year in 2030 and 56,866 in 2080. The water it can count on from its existing sources in a repeat of the worst drought on record falls over the same years, from 42,732 to 32,187 acre-feet. The difference, which the plan calls a need, grows from 4,098 to 24,679 acre-feet a year. The plan's recommended strategies for Amarillo add 33,536 acre-feet by 2080, which covers the need in every decade.

One acre-foot is 325,851 gallons. Figures in gallons are marked "our conversion".

Projected demand, 2030
46,830
acre-feet a year · about 41.8 million gallons a day, our conversion
Existing supply in drought, 2030
42,732
acre-feet a year from current sources
Need before new projects, 2080
24,679
acre-feet a year · 43% of projected demand, our calculation
Lake Meredith, Oct 15, 2026
44.6%
of conservation capacity · 223,036 of 500,000 acre-feet
Hollywood Road wastewater, Aug 2026
4.38 MGD
12-month average flow · permit allows 12 MGD

Demand and supply, 2030–2080

Acre-feet a year, summed over the three areas the plan splits Amarillo into (Potter County in two river basins, and Randall County). "Existing supply" is defined in state rules as the "maximum amount of water that is physically and legally accessible from existing sources for immediate use by a WUG under a repeat drought of record conditions" (31 TAC § 357.10). These are planning projections, not measurements.

10,00020,00030,00040,00050,00060,00070,000203020402050206020702080Projected demand, 2030: 46,830Projected demand, 2040: 49,513Projected demand, 2050: 51,716Projected demand, 2060: 53,441Projected demand, 2070: 55,161Projected demand, 2080: 56,866Existing supply (drought), 2030: 42,732Existing supply (drought), 2040: 39,980Existing supply (drought), 2050: 37,777Existing supply (drought), 2060: 34,557Existing supply (drought), 2070: 33,354Existing supply (drought), 2080: 32,187Existing supply + recommended strategies, 2030: 47,144Existing supply + recommended strategies, 2040: 56,306Existing supply + recommended strategies, 2050: 59,295Existing supply + recommended strategies, 2060: 61,501Existing supply + recommended strategies, 2070: 63,617Existing supply + recommended strategies, 2080: 65,723
Source: Texas Water Development Board, 2027 State Water Plan data (2026 regional water plans).
Line chart: Amarillo's projected water demand rises from 46,830 acre-feet a year in 2030 to 56,866 in 2080; existing drought supply falls from 42,732 to 32,187; with the recommended strategies, supply reaches 65,723.
xProjected demandExisting supply (drought)Existing supply + recommended strategies
203046,83042,73247,144
204049,51339,98056,306
205051,71637,77759,295
206053,44134,55761,501
207055,16133,35463,617
208056,86632,18765,723
YearProjected demandDrought supplyNeed
203046,83042,7324,098
204049,51339,9809,533
205051,71637,77713,939
206053,44134,55718,884
207055,16133,35421,807
208056,86632,18724,679
YearStrategiesUnmet needPopulation
20304,4120212,036
204016,3260224,901
205021,5180234,909
206026,9440242,745
207030,2630250,556
208033,5360258,303

Acre-feet a year; population is people.

Population is the plan's projection for the City's water utility, which can differ from the population inside city limits.

Where the water comes from

Existing drought supply by source, acre-feet a year. "Via CRMWA" is water the City buys from the Canadian River Municipal Water Authority, which runs Lake Meredith and the Roberts County well field for its member cities (CRMWA II storyline). In 2030, 61% of Amarillo's existing supply comes through CRMWA and 39% from the City's own wells (our calculation).

Source20302080
Ogallala Aquifer, Roberts Countyvia CRMWA22,15116,449
Ogallala Aquifer, Carson CountyCity of Amarillo wells13,28812,294
Lake Meredithvia CRMWA3,9541,530
Ogallala Aquifer, Potter CountyCity of Amarillo wells2,1501,239
Ogallala Aquifer, Randall CountyCity of Amarillo wells601182
Dockum Aquifer, Potter CountyCity of Amarillo wells507491
Ogallala and Edwards-Trinity (High Plains) aquifers, Deaf Smith CountyCity of Amarillo wells790
Dockum Aquifer, Carson CountyCity of Amarillo wells22
Total42,73232,187

The plan's recommended strategies

Water management strategies the regional plan recommends for Amarillo, with the supply each adds (or saves, for conservation), acre-feet a year. Sorted by 2080 supply.

Strategy20302080
Amarillo ASR

Aquifer storage and recovery · City of Amarillo

09,276
Expand Capacity CRMWA 2

Groundwater wells and other · CRMWA

06,511
Develop Roberts County Well Field (Ogallala Aquifer)

Groundwater wells and other · City of Amarillo

04,929
Replace Well Capacity

Groundwater wells and other · CRMWA

02,694
Water Audit And Leak Repair

Municipal conservation · City of Amarillo

2,0312,466
Desalination of Lake Meredith Water

Other strategies · CRMWA

02,357
Develop Potter/Carson County Well Field (Ogallala Aquifer)

Groundwater wells and other · City of Amarillo

02,287
Advanced Metering Infrastructure

Municipal conservation · City of Amarillo

1,4371,750
Municipal Conservation

Municipal conservation · City of Amarillo

9441,157
Brush Control

Other strategies · CRMWA

0109

Infrastructure projects behind those strategies

Capital cost as listed in the plan, for the whole project. CRMWA projects serve CRMWA's other member cities as well, so their cost is not Amarillo's share. Projects sponsored by the City of Amarillo alone total $1.01B (our calculation).

ProjectCapital cost
Expansion of Roberts County Well Field (Ogallala Aquifer) - CRMWA2

Online by 2030 · CRMWA · New conventional well; Transmission pipeline; Pump station

$767.8M
Water Audit and Leak Repair - Amarillo

Online by 2030 · City of Amarillo · Audit; Distribution system water loss mitigation

$171.9M
Advanced Metering Infrastructure - Amarillo

Online by 2030 · City of Amarillo · Data gathering and monitoring technology

$36.5M
Desalination of Lake Meredith Water - CRMWA

Online by 2040 · CRMWA · New desalination WTP; Pump station; Transmission pipeline; Storage tank/balancing reservoir

$196.2M
Direct Potable Reuse - Amarillo

Online by 2040 · City of Amarillo · New ASR or AR well; Transmission pipeline; Pump station; New advanced WTP

$112.1M
Develop Potter/Carson County Well Field Phase IIA (Ogallala Aquifer) - Amarillo

Online by 2040 · City of Amarillo · New conventional well; Transmission pipeline; Pump station

$65.2M
Replace Capacity of Roberts County Well Field (Ogallala Aquifer) - CRMWA

Online by 2040 · CRMWA · New conventional well

$35.6M
Aquifer Storage and Recovery - Amarillo

Online by 2040 · City of Amarillo · New ASR or AR well

$29.2M
Develop Potter/Carson County Well Field Phase 11B (Ogallala Aquifer) - Amarillo

Online by 2050 · City of Amarillo · New conventional well; Transmission pipeline; Pump station

$65.2M
Develop Roberts County Well Field (Ogallala Aquifer) - Amarillo

Online by 2070 · City of Amarillo · New conventional well; Transmission pipeline

$526.3M

Lake Meredith

Percent full measures water stored above the dead pool (the level below which water can't be drawn) against the lake's conservation capacity of 500,000 acre-feet. Yearly averages of daily readings; there are no readings from 1989 to 1994, and 1986 and 2026 are partial years. One daily reading (October 2, 1988) more than 20 points away from the days on either side is left out as a recording error.

On October 15, 2026 the lake was 44.6% full (223,036 acre-feet). The highest daily reading since 1986 was 79.7% on August 19, 1999. It read 0% on 1,107 days between May 25, 2011 and June 12, 2014. The plan counts on 3,954 acre-feet a year of Amarillo's 2030 drought supply coming from the lake.

25%50%75%100%1990200020102020Average percent full, 1986: 46.2%Average percent full, 1987: 55.2%Average percent full, 1988: 57.7%Average percent full, 1995: 57.3%Average percent full, 1996: 60.3%Average percent full, 1997: 70.9%Average percent full, 1998: 66%Average percent full, 1999: 70%Average percent full, 2000: 67.8%Average percent full, 2001: 55.3%Average percent full, 2002: 36.9%Average percent full, 2003: 26%Average percent full, 2004: 21.3%Average percent full, 2005: 25.9%Average percent full, 2006: 16.5%Average percent full, 2007: 13.7%Average percent full, 2008: 9.4%Average percent full, 2009: 9.3%Average percent full, 2010: 4%Average percent full, 2011: 0.2%Average percent full, 2012: 0%Average percent full, 2013: 0%Average percent full, 2014: 2.3%Average percent full, 2015: 14.1%Average percent full, 2016: 25.3%Average percent full, 2017: 28.5%Average percent full, 2018: 38.8%Average percent full, 2019: 40.2%Average percent full, 2020: 39.5%Average percent full, 2021: 36.3%Average percent full, 2022: 32.6%Average percent full, 2023: 39.3%Average percent full, 2024: 42.1%Average percent full, 2025: 44.6%Average percent full, 2026: 44.4%
Source: Texas Water Development Board, Water Data for Texas. Recent data are provisional.
Line chart: Lake Meredith average percent full by year, 1986 to 2026, with a gap from 1989 to 1994; lowest averages 2012 and 2013.
xAverage percent full
198646.2%
198755.2%
198857.7%
199557.3%
199660.3%
199770.9%
199866%
199970%
200067.8%
200155.3%
200236.9%
200326%
200421.3%
200525.9%
200616.5%
200713.7%
20089.4%
20099.3%
20104%
20110.2%
20120%
20130%
20142.3%
201514.1%
201625.3%
201728.5%
201838.8%
201940.2%
202039.5%
202136.3%
202232.6%
202339.3%
202442.1%
202544.6%
202644.4%
Yearly averages since 2015
YearAverageLowHigh
201514.1%5%25.7%
201625.3%23%27.1%
201728.5%23%40.7%
201838.8%36%40.8%
201940.2%38.1%42.3%
202039.5%35.7%42.3%
202136.3%34.6%38.8%
202232.6%30.6%34.6%
202339.3%29.6%48%
202442.1%38.8%44.5%
202544.6%40.6%48.3%
2026 (partial)44.4%40.4%47%

Wastewater: Hollywood Road plant

Flow the City reports to the EPA each month under federal discharge permit TX0025810, as a 12-month average in million gallons a day (MGD). The permit limits that average to 12 MGD. This covers the Hollywood Road plant, the City wastewater plant with a federal discharge permit in EPA's data (wastewater storyline).

The 12-month average for the period ending Aug 2026 was 4.38 MGD, 36% of the permitted 12 MGD (our calculation). The highest reported since Jan 2009 was 8.35 MGD, for the period ending Nov 2010.

2 MGD4 MGD6 MGD8 MGD10 MGD12 MGD14 MGD20102014201820222026Permit limit, 12 MGD12-month average flow, 2009.0416666666667: 3.88 MGD12-month average flow, 2009.125: 3.66 MGD12-month average flow, 2009.2083333333333: 3.65 MGD12-month average flow, 2009.2916666666667: 3.76 MGD12-month average flow, 2009.375: 3.92 MGD12-month average flow, 2009.4583333333333: 4.19 MGD12-month average flow, 2009.5416666666667: 4.23 MGD12-month average flow, 2009.625: 4.53 MGD12-month average flow, 2009.7083333333333: 4.66 MGD12-month average flow, 2009.7916666666667: 4.27 MGD12-month average flow, 2009.875: 3.89 MGD12-month average flow, 2010.0416666666667: 3.87 MGD12-month average flow, 2010.125: 4.20 MGD12-month average flow, 2010.2083333333333: 4.32 MGD12-month average flow, 2010.2916666666667: 4.28 MGD12-month average flow, 2010.375: 4.39 MGD12-month average flow, 2010.4583333333333: 4.46 MGD12-month average flow, 2010.5416666666667: 4.48 MGD12-month average flow, 2010.625: 4.16 MGD12-month average flow, 2010.7083333333333: 4.20 MGD12-month average flow, 2010.7916666666667: 4.73 MGD12-month average flow, 2010.875: 8.35 MGD12-month average flow, 2010.9583333333333: 5.16 MGD12-month average flow, 2011.0416666666667: 7.94 MGD12-month average flow, 2011.125: 4.82 MGD12-month average flow, 2011.2083333333333: 4.91 MGD12-month average flow, 2011.2916666666667: 5.04 MGD12-month average flow, 2011.375: 5.14 MGD12-month average flow, 2011.4583333333333: 4.86 MGD12-month average flow, 2011.5416666666667: 4.79 MGD12-month average flow, 2011.625: 4.80 MGD12-month average flow, 2011.7083333333333: 4.53 MGD12-month average flow, 2011.7916666666667: 4.11 MGD12-month average flow, 2011.875: 4.30 MGD12-month average flow, 2011.9583333333333: 4.54 MGD12-month average flow, 2012.0416666666667: 4.67 MGD12-month average flow, 2012.125: 4.53 MGD12-month average flow, 2012.2083333333333: 4.55 MGD12-month average flow, 2012.2916666666667: 4.65 MGD12-month average flow, 2012.375: 4.57 MGD12-month average flow, 2012.4583333333333: 4.63 MGD12-month average flow, 2012.5416666666667: 4.69 MGD12-month average flow, 2012.625: 4.68 MGD12-month average flow, 2012.7083333333333: 4.71 MGD12-month average flow, 2012.7916666666667: 5.02 MGD12-month average flow, 2012.875: 4.91 MGD12-month average flow, 2012.9583333333333: 4.80 MGD12-month average flow, 2013.0416666666667: 5.01 MGD12-month average flow, 2013.125: 5.29 MGD12-month average flow, 2013.2083333333333: 5.27 MGD12-month average flow, 2013.2916666666667: 5.26 MGD12-month average flow, 2013.375: 5.53 MGD12-month average flow, 2013.4583333333333: 5.80 MGD12-month average flow, 2013.5416666666667: 5.83 MGD12-month average flow, 2013.625: 6.08 MGD12-month average flow, 2013.7083333333333: 6.40 MGD12-month average flow, 2013.7916666666667: 6.51 MGD12-month average flow, 2013.875: 6.64 MGD12-month average flow, 2013.9583333333333: 6.63 MGD12-month average flow, 2014.0416666666667: 6.43 MGD12-month average flow, 2014.125: 6.29 MGD12-month average flow, 2014.2083333333333: 6.24 MGD12-month average flow, 2014.2916666666667: 6.20 MGD12-month average flow, 2014.375: 6.00 MGD12-month average flow, 2014.4583333333333: 5.94 MGD12-month average flow, 2014.5416666666667: 6.08 MGD12-month average flow, 2014.625: 5.88 MGD12-month average flow, 2014.7083333333333: 5.78 MGD12-month average flow, 2014.7916666666667: 5.55 MGD12-month average flow, 2014.875: 5.33 MGD12-month average flow, 2014.9583333333333: 5.27 MGD12-month average flow, 2015.0416666666667: 5.27 MGD12-month average flow, 2015.125: 5.33 MGD12-month average flow, 2015.2083333333333: 5.32 MGD12-month average flow, 2015.2916666666667: 5.23 MGD12-month average flow, 2015.375: 5.32 MGD12-month average flow, 2015.4583333333333: 5.38 MGD12-month average flow, 2015.5416666666667: 5.53 MGD12-month average flow, 2015.625: 5.68 MGD12-month average flow, 2015.7083333333333: 5.65 MGD12-month average flow, 2015.7916666666667: 5.80 MGD12-month average flow, 2015.875: 5.91 MGD12-month average flow, 2015.9583333333333: 5.92 MGD12-month average flow, 2016.0416666666667: 5.90 MGD12-month average flow, 2016.125: 5.79 MGD12-month average flow, 2016.2083333333333: 5.79 MGD12-month average flow, 2016.2916666666667: 5.81 MGD12-month average flow, 2016.375: 5.84 MGD12-month average flow, 2016.4583333333333: 5.76 MGD12-month average flow, 2016.5416666666667: 5.60 MGD12-month average flow, 2016.625: 5.50 MGD12-month average flow, 2016.7083333333333: 5.56 MGD12-month average flow, 2016.7916666666667: 5.62 MGD12-month average flow, 2016.875: 5.71 MGD12-month average flow, 2016.9583333333333: 5.85 MGD12-month average flow, 2017.0416666666667: 6.02 MGD12-month average flow, 2017.125: 6.21 MGD12-month average flow, 2017.2083333333333: 6.34 MGD12-month average flow, 2017.2916666666667: 6.50 MGD12-month average flow, 2017.375: 6.55 MGD12-month average flow, 2017.4583333333333: 6.47 MGD12-month average flow, 2017.5416666666667: 6.30 MGD12-month average flow, 2017.625: 6.48 MGD12-month average flow, 2017.7083333333333: 6.50 MGD12-month average flow, 2017.7916666666667: 5.84 MGD12-month average flow, 2017.875: 6.51 MGD12-month average flow, 2017.9583333333333: 6.49 MGD12-month average flow, 2018.0416666666667: 6.39 MGD12-month average flow, 2018.125: 6.33 MGD12-month average flow, 2018.2083333333333: 6.33 MGD12-month average flow, 2018.2916666666667: 6.08 MGD12-month average flow, 2018.375: 5.66 MGD12-month average flow, 2018.4583333333333: 5.54 MGD12-month average flow, 2018.5416666666667: 5.64 MGD12-month average flow, 2018.625: 5.38 MGD12-month average flow, 2018.7083333333333: 5.34 MGD12-month average flow, 2018.7916666666667: 5.44 MGD12-month average flow, 2018.875: 5.02 MGD12-month average flow, 2018.9583333333333: 4.83 MGD12-month average flow, 2019.0416666666667: 4.67 MGD12-month average flow, 2019.125: 4.38 MGD12-month average flow, 2019.2083333333333: 4.05 MGD12-month average flow, 2019.2916666666667: 4.04 MGD12-month average flow, 2019.375: 4 MGD12-month average flow, 2019.4583333333333: 3.81 MGD12-month average flow, 2019.5416666666667: 3.83 MGD12-month average flow, 2019.625: 3.95 MGD12-month average flow, 2019.7083333333333: 4.22 MGD12-month average flow, 2019.7916666666667: 4.26 MGD12-month average flow, 2019.875: 4.40 MGD12-month average flow, 2019.9583333333333: 4.53 MGD12-month average flow, 2020.0416666666667: 4.70 MGD12-month average flow, 2020.125: 5.01 MGD12-month average flow, 2020.2083333333333: 5.35 MGD12-month average flow, 2020.2916666666667: 5.58 MGD12-month average flow, 2020.375: 5.72 MGD12-month average flow, 2020.4583333333333: 5.97 MGD12-month average flow, 2020.5416666666667: 5.80 MGD12-month average flow, 2020.625: 5.64 MGD12-month average flow, 2020.7083333333333: 5.16 MGD12-month average flow, 2020.7916666666667: 4.89 MGD12-month average flow, 2020.875: 4.77 MGD12-month average flow, 2020.9583333333333: 4.59 MGD12-month average flow, 2021.0416666666667: 4.35 MGD12-month average flow, 2021.125: 4.08 MGD12-month average flow, 2021.2083333333333: 3.86 MGD12-month average flow, 2021.2916666666667: 3.70 MGD12-month average flow, 2021.375: 3.73 MGD12-month average flow, 2021.4583333333333: 3.77 MGD12-month average flow, 2021.5416666666667: 3.92 MGD12-month average flow, 2021.625: 3.18 MGD12-month average flow, 2021.7083333333333: 3.25 MGD12-month average flow, 2021.7916666666667: 4.19 MGD12-month average flow, 2021.875: 4.29 MGD12-month average flow, 2021.9583333333333: 4.20 MGD12-month average flow, 2022.0416666666667: 4.09 MGD12-month average flow, 2022.125: 4.04 MGD12-month average flow, 2022.2083333333333: 3.99 MGD12-month average flow, 2022.2916666666667: 3.94 MGD12-month average flow, 2022.375: 3.85 MGD12-month average flow, 2022.4583333333333: 3.96 MGD12-month average flow, 2022.5416666666667: 3.72 MGD12-month average flow, 2022.625: 3.59 MGD12-month average flow, 2022.7083333333333: 3.49 MGD12-month average flow, 2022.7916666666667: 3.44 MGD12-month average flow, 2022.875: 3.70 MGD12-month average flow, 2022.9583333333333: 3.94 MGD12-month average flow, 2023.0416666666667: 4.05 MGD12-month average flow, 2023.125: 3.95 MGD12-month average flow, 2023.2083333333333: 4.04 MGD12-month average flow, 2023.2916666666667: 4.07 MGD12-month average flow, 2023.375: 4.13 MGD12-month average flow, 2023.4583333333333: 4.25 MGD12-month average flow, 2023.5416666666667: 4.35 MGD12-month average flow, 2023.625: 4.38 MGD12-month average flow, 2023.7083333333333: 4.42 MGD12-month average flow, 2023.7916666666667: 4.46 MGD12-month average flow, 2023.875: 4.31 MGD12-month average flow, 2023.9583333333333: 4.16 MGD12-month average flow, 2024.0416666666667: 4.33 MGD12-month average flow, 2024.125: 4.67 MGD12-month average flow, 2024.2083333333333: 4.70 MGD12-month average flow, 2024.2916666666667: 4.75 MGD12-month average flow, 2024.375: 4.88 MGD12-month average flow, 2024.4583333333333: 4.75 MGD12-month average flow, 2024.5416666666667: 4.98 MGD12-month average flow, 2024.625: 5.08 MGD12-month average flow, 2024.7083333333333: 5.39 MGD12-month average flow, 2024.7916666666667: 5.56 MGD12-month average flow, 2024.875: 5.52 MGD12-month average flow, 2024.9583333333333: 6.25 MGD12-month average flow, 2025.0416666666667: 6.45 MGD12-month average flow, 2025.125: 6.62 MGD12-month average flow, 2025.2083333333333: 6.82 MGD12-month average flow, 2025.2916666666667: 6.93 MGD12-month average flow, 2025.375: 6.87 MGD12-month average flow, 2025.4583333333333: 6.72 MGD12-month average flow, 2025.5416666666667: 6.82 MGD12-month average flow, 2025.625: 6.85 MGD12-month average flow, 2025.7083333333333: 6.59 MGD12-month average flow, 2025.7916666666667: 6.48 MGD12-month average flow, 2025.875: 6.30 MGD12-month average flow, 2025.9583333333333: 6.25 MGD12-month average flow, 2026.0416666666667: 6.09 MGD12-month average flow, 2026.125: 5.77 MGD12-month average flow, 2026.2083333333333: 5.31 MGD12-month average flow, 2026.2916666666667: 4.92 MGD12-month average flow, 2026.375: 4.87 MGD12-month average flow, 2026.4583333333333: 4.73 MGD12-month average flow, 2026.5416666666667: 4.51 MGD12-month average flow, 2026.625: 4.38 MGD
Source: U.S. EPA, ECHO discharge monitoring reports for permit TX0025810.
Line chart: Hollywood Road wastewater plant 12-month average flow, Jan 2009 to Aug 2026, between 3.2 and 8.4 MGD, against a permit limit of 12 MGD.
x12-month average flow
2009.04166666666673.88 MGD
2009.1253.66 MGD
2009.20833333333333.65 MGD
2009.29166666666673.76 MGD
2009.3753.92 MGD
2009.45833333333334.19 MGD
2009.54166666666674.23 MGD
2009.6254.53 MGD
2009.70833333333334.66 MGD
2009.79166666666674.27 MGD
2009.8753.89 MGD
2010.04166666666673.87 MGD
2010.1254.20 MGD
2010.20833333333334.32 MGD
2010.29166666666674.28 MGD
2010.3754.39 MGD
2010.45833333333334.46 MGD
2010.54166666666674.48 MGD
2010.6254.16 MGD
2010.70833333333334.20 MGD
2010.79166666666674.73 MGD
2010.8758.35 MGD
2010.95833333333335.16 MGD
2011.04166666666677.94 MGD
2011.1254.82 MGD
2011.20833333333334.91 MGD
2011.29166666666675.04 MGD
2011.3755.14 MGD
2011.45833333333334.86 MGD
2011.54166666666674.79 MGD
2011.6254.80 MGD
2011.70833333333334.53 MGD
2011.79166666666674.11 MGD
2011.8754.30 MGD
2011.95833333333334.54 MGD
2012.04166666666674.67 MGD
2012.1254.53 MGD
2012.20833333333334.55 MGD
2012.29166666666674.65 MGD
2012.3754.57 MGD
2012.45833333333334.63 MGD
2012.54166666666674.69 MGD
2012.6254.68 MGD
2012.70833333333334.71 MGD
2012.79166666666675.02 MGD
2012.8754.91 MGD
2012.95833333333334.80 MGD
2013.04166666666675.01 MGD
2013.1255.29 MGD
2013.20833333333335.27 MGD
2013.29166666666675.26 MGD
2013.3755.53 MGD
2013.45833333333335.80 MGD
2013.54166666666675.83 MGD
2013.6256.08 MGD
2013.70833333333336.40 MGD
2013.79166666666676.51 MGD
2013.8756.64 MGD
2013.95833333333336.63 MGD
2014.04166666666676.43 MGD
2014.1256.29 MGD
2014.20833333333336.24 MGD
2014.29166666666676.20 MGD
2014.3756.00 MGD
2014.45833333333335.94 MGD
2014.54166666666676.08 MGD
2014.6255.88 MGD
2014.70833333333335.78 MGD
2014.79166666666675.55 MGD
2014.8755.33 MGD
2014.95833333333335.27 MGD
2015.04166666666675.27 MGD
2015.1255.33 MGD
2015.20833333333335.32 MGD
2015.29166666666675.23 MGD
2015.3755.32 MGD
2015.45833333333335.38 MGD
2015.54166666666675.53 MGD
2015.6255.68 MGD
2015.70833333333335.65 MGD
2015.79166666666675.80 MGD
2015.8755.91 MGD
2015.95833333333335.92 MGD
2016.04166666666675.90 MGD
2016.1255.79 MGD
2016.20833333333335.79 MGD
2016.29166666666675.81 MGD
2016.3755.84 MGD
2016.45833333333335.76 MGD
2016.54166666666675.60 MGD
2016.6255.50 MGD
2016.70833333333335.56 MGD
2016.79166666666675.62 MGD
2016.8755.71 MGD
2016.95833333333335.85 MGD
2017.04166666666676.02 MGD
2017.1256.21 MGD
2017.20833333333336.34 MGD
2017.29166666666676.50 MGD
2017.3756.55 MGD
2017.45833333333336.47 MGD
2017.54166666666676.30 MGD
2017.6256.48 MGD
2017.70833333333336.50 MGD
2017.79166666666675.84 MGD
2017.8756.51 MGD
2017.95833333333336.49 MGD
2018.04166666666676.39 MGD
2018.1256.33 MGD
2018.20833333333336.33 MGD
2018.29166666666676.08 MGD
2018.3755.66 MGD
2018.45833333333335.54 MGD
2018.54166666666675.64 MGD
2018.6255.38 MGD
2018.70833333333335.34 MGD
2018.79166666666675.44 MGD
2018.8755.02 MGD
2018.95833333333334.83 MGD
2019.04166666666674.67 MGD
2019.1254.38 MGD
2019.20833333333334.05 MGD
2019.29166666666674.04 MGD
2019.3754 MGD
2019.45833333333333.81 MGD
2019.54166666666673.83 MGD
2019.6253.95 MGD
2019.70833333333334.22 MGD
2019.79166666666674.26 MGD
2019.8754.40 MGD
2019.95833333333334.53 MGD
2020.04166666666674.70 MGD
2020.1255.01 MGD
2020.20833333333335.35 MGD
2020.29166666666675.58 MGD
2020.3755.72 MGD
2020.45833333333335.97 MGD
2020.54166666666675.80 MGD
2020.6255.64 MGD
2020.70833333333335.16 MGD
2020.79166666666674.89 MGD
2020.8754.77 MGD
2020.95833333333334.59 MGD
2021.04166666666674.35 MGD
2021.1254.08 MGD
2021.20833333333333.86 MGD
2021.29166666666673.70 MGD
2021.3753.73 MGD
2021.45833333333333.77 MGD
2021.54166666666673.92 MGD
2021.6253.18 MGD
2021.70833333333333.25 MGD
2021.79166666666674.19 MGD
2021.8754.29 MGD
2021.95833333333334.20 MGD
2022.04166666666674.09 MGD
2022.1254.04 MGD
2022.20833333333333.99 MGD
2022.29166666666673.94 MGD
2022.3753.85 MGD
2022.45833333333333.96 MGD
2022.54166666666673.72 MGD
2022.6253.59 MGD
2022.70833333333333.49 MGD
2022.79166666666673.44 MGD
2022.8753.70 MGD
2022.95833333333333.94 MGD
2023.04166666666674.05 MGD
2023.1253.95 MGD
2023.20833333333334.04 MGD
2023.29166666666674.07 MGD
2023.3754.13 MGD
2023.45833333333334.25 MGD
2023.54166666666674.35 MGD
2023.6254.38 MGD
2023.70833333333334.42 MGD
2023.79166666666674.46 MGD
2023.8754.31 MGD
2023.95833333333334.16 MGD
2024.04166666666674.33 MGD
2024.1254.67 MGD
2024.20833333333334.70 MGD
2024.29166666666674.75 MGD
2024.3754.88 MGD
2024.45833333333334.75 MGD
2024.54166666666674.98 MGD
2024.6255.08 MGD
2024.70833333333335.39 MGD
2024.79166666666675.56 MGD
2024.8755.52 MGD
2024.95833333333336.25 MGD
2025.04166666666676.45 MGD
2025.1256.62 MGD
2025.20833333333336.82 MGD
2025.29166666666676.93 MGD
2025.3756.87 MGD
2025.45833333333336.72 MGD
2025.54166666666676.82 MGD
2025.6256.85 MGD
2025.70833333333336.59 MGD
2025.79166666666676.48 MGD
2025.8756.30 MGD
2025.95833333333336.25 MGD
2026.04166666666676.09 MGD
2026.1255.77 MGD
2026.20833333333335.31 MGD
2026.29166666666674.92 MGD
2026.3754.87 MGD
2026.45833333333334.73 MGD
2026.54166666666674.51 MGD
2026.6254.38 MGD

Related storylines