· Related development
Staff drop the single new plant concept; estimate falls below $1.5 billion
The City gave an update following "regular and numerous malfunctions at the plants." Staff proposed rehabilitating or repurposing parts of the Hollywood Road plant, building a smaller facility, and assessing River Road, in place of one new centralized plant. Staff said the cost would fall from a high estimate of $2-3 billion to under $1.5 billion.[1][2]
What the sources say
- ⚠ Sources differ
Sources give the River Road plant's construction year as 1922 or 1927. The City said it is being assessed for operational modifications and expansion for future growth.
- ⚠ Sources differ
Published cost estimates for replacing or expanding the wastewater plants have changed over time. All are estimates; the City has said the actual cost will not be known until bids or the design phase.
Reported value 1[3]
- Estimate usd max
- $3,000,000,000
- Date
- 2025-05-28
Up to $3 billion to replace Hollywood Road; Assistant City Manager Donny Hooper called it a rough estimate based on similar-sized facilities.
Reported value 2[1]
- 0
- 2,000,000,000
- 1
- 3,000,000,000
- Revised usd max
- $1,500,000,000
- Date
- 2025-08-26
Original single-plant high estimate $2-3 billion; staff said revised approach would cost under $1.5 billion.
Reported value 3[4]
- Estimate
- $1,500,000,000
- Total needs
- $1,800,000,000
- Date
- 2026-05-01
Rate-study coverage: a planned $1.5 billion plant within about $1.8 billion in water and wastewater needs.
Reported value 4[5]
- Estimate
- $1,200,000,000
- Date
- 2026-08-06
About $1.2 billion for the full project (KFDA); a council member referred to $1 billion-$1.2 billion for Hollywood Road and River Road combined.
Reported value 5[6]
- 0
- 860,000,000
- 1
- 1,300,000,000
- Date
- 2026-08-07
Projects of similar scope elsewhere were estimated at $860 million to $1.3 billion (Amarillo Tribune).
- ✓ Verified
KFDA reported that the City's August 2025 update followed "regular and numerous malfunctions at the plants."[1]
- ✓ Verified
The City said the two plants are "almost a combined 160 years old" and neither had a major upgrade in more than 20 years.[2]